Performance upgrade that will not decrease fuel mileage - Chevy SSR Forum
Chevy SSR Forum Chevy SSR Forum


» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Chevy SSR Forum > SSR Discussion > SSR Performance


SsrFanatic.com is the premier Chevrolet SSR Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Poll Results: Best fuel mileage performance upgrade
Nitrous 4 16.00%
Supercharger 16 64.00%
Cam and head upgrade 5 20.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2010, 08:28 AM   #1 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Performance upgrade that will not decrease fuel mileage

On my pole, which one would impact the fuel mileage the least and still give me about 50 - 100 hp increase? I'm only looking to get my 5.3 to 400 hp. I have already upgrade to the superchip, headers are on the way and the exhaust has been changed to Dynomax VT's. So, after the header install it should be at about 350hp.

Would I be better off just swapping in a LS2 intake (I think thats the one that fits) to get closer to 400 hp mark?

Last edited by slicks2003; 10-22-2010 at 08:49 AM.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-22-2010, 10:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Achias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bettendorf, IA
Posts: 681


My SSR:
2003 "Ilsa" True Duals w/Jones Glasspacks, Eibach Springs, Addco Sway Bars, 4.56 Gears
View Achias's Photo Gallery
The fuel mileage isn't much different with my new supercharger - that is, until I jump on it. A heavy foot on a supercharger definitely has an adverse effect on gas mileage. So far, I'm failing in avoiding the lead foot, but it sure is fun to wind it out once-in-awhile.
Achias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 12:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Deputy Dawg
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
RUN ROD RUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Camarillo, CA.
Posts: 26,018


My SSR:
2004 Custom Two Tone
View RUN ROD RUN's Photo Gallery
Honestly … How can you have a performance upgrade that will not decrease fuel mileage? I know if I were to get some extra performance, my right foot would be unstable for the most part.
__________________
SSR Parts Exchange It works for us all
RUN ROD RUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 12:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achias View Post
The fuel mileage isn't much different with my new supercharger - that is, until I jump on it. A heavy foot on a supercharger definitely has an adverse effect on gas mileage. So far, I'm failing in avoiding the lead foot, but it sure is fun to wind it out once-in-awhile.
Thats what I thought, I did not have anyone to verify that with, thanks.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 12:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
Supporting Member
 
Topspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Whitmore Lk., MI
Posts: 1,453


My SSR:
05 6 sp. with 4.56 gears, ZR1 clutch, Edelbrock intake, Lunati cam, Crane rockers, C6 modified pan
View Topspin's Photo Gallery
The nitrous does not impact fuel mileage at all, unless you arm and use it. The other two are always "on" and working to one degree or another.
Topspin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 01:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspin View Post
The nitrous does not impact fuel mileage at all, unless you arm and use it. The other two are always "on" and working to one degree or another.
I'm leaning in the Nitrous direction.. I think a safe shot of up too 125hp would be fine for a 5.3. For about $900 I can get an entire setup including a remote bottle opener and a window switch.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 02:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Belvidere, New Jersey
Posts: 2,420


My SSR:
'03 RED vin1337, '06(lastoneinblack) vin 24107..Sadly sold '04UV,'05SILVER,'06PACBLU FPR
View ssrtruck's Photo Gallery
Providing you stay out of it, the supercharger is still the best over all add on.
It gives you smooth performance across the entire hp/tq curve. And increases fuel burn efficiency, helps engine to cooler(with inter cooler feature.
All this adds up to better fuel mileage. The cost is higher, and if you do the headers and exaust package, a different tune will have to be installed (not the generic tune that comes with the Maggie). If you get the Maggie through JOE, I'm sure he can set you up with that.
Nitrous is cheap, on demand and will give you the 100 hp your looking for, but you will still need a tune that can adjust for the shot.
ssrtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 10:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
ONE OF THE.....
Supporting Member
 
"BLACKIE"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: IN MY "GEERAGE"
Posts: 595


My SSR:
IS JUST BLACK....
View "BLACKIE"'s Photo Gallery
Hi "slicks2003"

I have used various NOS systems in the past on my '67 Chevy II. From the "single shot" to the "fogger/pro fogger," the systems that are available today are a lot more sophisticated then the one's I stopped using 15 years ago. I had enought of the "gas", I just built bigger and stronger engines with out the aid of it. There were alot of varibles back then that I'm sure that are still present with today's systems. I.E. timing, fuel pressure, fuel/air mixture, comp ratio, cam lift/duration, engine temperture and so on.... Not to mention the strength of the lower end that take's the hit of the "gas" when the switch is activated.

It's called "Cheap H.P." for a reason, I can't tell you how many "Saturday night" drag cars I saw explode their engines after a few passess down "Bailey Ave" NOS is not just something you toss on and go. There's also a lot to do with the plumbing of the system and the temperture of the bottle it's self, I.E. meaning the temperture of the gas as it is delivered to the engine. then there's the purging of the system before it's use. For a drag racer it's part of the gig when using the "gas" But... For a street ride it can become a big headache for it's owner, then throw in the computer that controll's your ride and the headache can get even bigger! Yep ....After you get a taste of your new found H.P. You will be hitting the button more and more and then POOF! I for one would MAKE sure that whoever is tunning your engine, know's what he is doing with the "gas"

BLACKIE
__________________
"BLACKIE" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 04:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
MnMsToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 6,744


View MnMsToy's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicks2003 View Post
On my pole, which one would impact the fuel mileage the least and still give me about 50 - 100 hp increase? I'm only looking to get my 5.3 to 400 hp. I have already upgrade to the superchip, headers are on the way and the exhaust has been changed to Dynomax VT's. So, after the header install it should be at about 350hp.

Would I be better off just swapping in a LS2 intake (I think thats the one that fits) to get closer to 400 hp mark?
Its not on your list but what about 4:56 gears. They will give you better mileage city driving but less on the highway.
MnMsToy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 05:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnMsToy View Post
Its not on your list but what about 4:56 gears. They will give you better mileage city driving but less on the highway.
Yup, I have not only 4:56 gears on order but headers with high flow cats as well.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 10:32 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Belvidere, New Jersey
Posts: 2,420


My SSR:
'03 RED vin1337, '06(lastoneinblack) vin 24107..Sadly sold '04UV,'05SILVER,'06PACBLU FPR
View ssrtruck's Photo Gallery
4.56 gears ? THERE GOES YOUR FUEL MILEAGE !!

Last edited by ssrtruck; 10-23-2010 at 10:41 AM.
ssrtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 11:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
Deputy Dawg
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
RUN ROD RUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Camarillo, CA.
Posts: 26,018


My SSR:
2004 Custom Two Tone
View RUN ROD RUN's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnMsToy View Post
Its not on your list but what about 4:56 gears. They will give you better mileage city driving but less on the highway.
Are you kidding? LTs SSR has those 4.56 & her gas mileage is horriable compare with my SSR.
__________________
SSR Parts Exchange It works for us all
RUN ROD RUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 02:42 PM   #13 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUN ROD RUN View Post
Are you kidding? LTs SSR has those 4.56 & her gas mileage is horriable compare with my SSR.
From what others have told me who went with 4:56's in their SSR's, their gas milage went up around town and down about 1 -2 MPG on the highway. More then one person said this.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 02:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
Deputy Dawg
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
RUN ROD RUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Camarillo, CA.
Posts: 26,018


My SSR:
2004 Custom Two Tone
View RUN ROD RUN's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicks2003 View Post
From what others have told me who went with 4:56's in their SSR's, their gas milage went up around town and down about 1 -2 MPG on the highway. More then one person said this.
Is there anything written about gas mileage and gear change in JimG book? I don't know, just asking.
__________________
SSR Parts Exchange It works for us all
RUN ROD RUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 08:08 PM   #15 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUN ROD RUN View Post
Is there anything written about gas mileage and gear change in JimG book? I don't know, just asking.
If you really need to know, ask like I did.. Others here on THIS forum have told me that around town their mileage INCREASED.. That's all I care about.

And by the way, its only a 500 rpm deference between the 3:73's and the 4:56's at 70mph (2,100rpm vers 2,570rpm)

Last edited by slicks2003; 10-23-2010 at 08:20 PM.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 08:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Deputy Dawg
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
RUN ROD RUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Camarillo, CA.
Posts: 26,018


My SSR:
2004 Custom Two Tone
View RUN ROD RUN's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicks2003 View Post
And by the way, its only a 500 rpm deference between the 3:73's and the 4:56's at 70mph (2,100rpm vers 2,570rpm)
... and where do you think those extra 500 RPM comes from?
__________________
SSR Parts Exchange It works for us all
RUN ROD RUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 11:59 PM   #17 (permalink)
Daily Driver
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
xoxoxoBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DelCo, PA
Posts: 2,582


My SSR:
'06- Silver/Copper- 121421
View xoxoxoBruce's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicks2003 View Post
And by the way, its only a 500 rpm deference between the 3:73's and the 4:56's at 70mph (2,100rpm vers 2,570rpm)
I'm surprised, I thought it was more like 800.
__________________
SSR Fanatics.....Knowledgeable friends, just a click away.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 12:43 AM   #18 (permalink)
I sure love my Hot SSRod
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
turnheadz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Langley, B.C. CANADA
Posts: 9,715


My SSR:
Pearl over UV tu-tone - "PurLple" w/ custom billet rallye wheels/baby moons & wide whitewalls, 4:56s
View turnheadz's Photo Gallery
swaping rear gears will not increase your HP
__________________
SANDY
lots of photographs in My Gallery
turnheadz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 07:06 AM   #19 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUN ROD RUN View Post
... and where do you think those extra 500 RPM comes from?
Humm, I have no idea... Of course I know...
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 07:07 AM   #20 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by turnheadz View Post
swaping rear gears will not increase your HP
I never said it did and I never stated it would
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 07:11 AM   #21 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
I'm surprised, I thought it was more like 800.
Yup, the 295-40x20 is 29.3 inches in dia, I used the RPM calculator to figure out the difference here.

Tire size Tire size calculator

RPM Calculator
Randy's Ring & Pinion. RPM Calculator.
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:10 AM   #22 (permalink)
Supporting SSR Hobbyist
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Mike in AZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 5,809


My SSR:
"BLOWN06" Pac Blue #21661 Born 8/29/05
View Mike in AZ's Photo Gallery
Doing the math.........

The difference between 3.73 and 4.11 is 10.19%. Changing to these gears means:
1) At any given speed, your engine rpm will be ~10% higher.
2) At full throttle, regardless of speed, you will have ~10% more torque at the rear wheels
3) Without recalibration, your speedo will read ~10% fast
4) At 84 mph, you will be spinning the engine at 2780 instead of 2500

The difference between 3.73 and 4.56 is 22.25%. Changing to these gears means:
1) At any given speed, your engine rpm will be ~22% higher.
2) At full throttle, regardless of speed, you will have ~22% more torque at the rear wheels
3) Without recalibration, your speedo will read ~20% fast
4) At 84 mph, you will be spinning the engine at 3056 instead of 2500

The photo below is 84mph (true speed) with 2500rpm on my '06 automatic with OEM tires. There is parallax error on the tach, because of the camera angle, but you can see the shadow of the needle..... I'm calling it 2500.

Life is full of choices......... You just need to have all the information possible before you make one.

Regards,

Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Performance upgrade that will not decrease fuel mileage-84mph.jpg  
__________________
Trust and Generosity are contagious.

One of the "Blues Brothers"

www.simple-engineering.com
Mike in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:53 AM   #23 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
slicks2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SSR Heaven
Posts: 436


My SSR:
2003 Redline, SuperChip, OBX Headers, High Flow Cats, Dynomax VT, K&N Cold Air, 4:56 gears
View slicks2003's Photo Gallery
Thanks Mike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike in AZ View Post
The difference between 3.73 and 4.11 is 10.19%. Changing to these gears means:
1) At any given speed, your engine rpm will be ~10% higher.
2) At full throttle, regardless of speed, you will have ~10% more torque at the rear wheels
3) Without recalibration, your speedo will read ~10% fast
4) At 84 mph, you will be spinning the engine at 2780 instead of 2500

The difference between 3.73 and 4.56 is 22.25%. Changing to these gears means:
1) At any given speed, your engine rpm will be ~22% higher.
2) At full throttle, regardless of speed, you will have ~22% more torque at the rear wheels
3) Without recalibration, your speedo will read ~20% fast
4) At 84 mph, you will be spinning the engine at 3056 instead of 2500

The photo below is 84mph (true speed) with 2500rpm on my '06 automatic with OEM tires. There is parallax error on the tach, because of the camera angle, but you can see the shadow of the needle..... I'm calling it 2500.

Life is full of choices......... You just need to have all the information possible before you make one.

Regards,

Mike
slicks2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 11:36 AM   #24 (permalink)
I sure love my Hot SSRod
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
turnheadz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Langley, B.C. CANADA
Posts: 9,715


My SSR:
Pearl over UV tu-tone - "PurLple" w/ custom billet rallye wheels/baby moons & wide whitewalls, 4:56s
View turnheadz's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by slicks2003 View Post
I never said it did and I never stated it would
I think it's an excellent way to get a kick in the pants feel
__________________
SANDY
lots of photographs in My Gallery
turnheadz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 05:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
Daily Driver
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
xoxoxoBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DelCo, PA
Posts: 2,582


My SSR:
'06- Silver/Copper- 121421
View xoxoxoBruce's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike in AZ View Post
The photo below is 84mph (true speed) with 2500rpm on my '06 automatic with OEM tires. There is parallax error on the tach, because of the camera angle, but you can see the shadow of the needle..... I'm calling it 2500.

Life is full of choices......... You just need to have all the information possible before you make one.

Regards,

Mike
It should go in the official record, that picture was taken in Montana during daylight hours, where 84mph is legal.
__________________
SSR Fanatics.....Knowledgeable friends, just a click away.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 05:33 PM   #26 (permalink)
Native AriZonie
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Doug Allen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moon Valley, AZ
Posts: 13,514


My SSR:
Hellvis
View Doug Allen's Photo Gallery
There are very few performance mods that you can perform without a decrease in gas mileage.

That said, most performance mods such as gearing, cam, and supercharger make very little difference in gas mileage until you go WOT, that's what eats gas.
__________________
Doug Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:06 PM   #27 (permalink)
Deputy Dawg
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
RUN ROD RUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Camarillo, CA.
Posts: 26,018


My SSR:
2004 Custom Two Tone
View RUN ROD RUN's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by js73751 View Post
I'm going to step way out on a limb here. If you are looking for an SSR with a higher level of performance, why didn't you buy an 05 or 06? If that was the limit of your budget I understand. I would just like to note that by the time you add all of the performance enhancing bolt-ons to get it to perform as you wish, if you took the money necessary to do so, and added it to what you paid for your 04, ($24,000 if I am correct) you could probably have purchased an 05-06.

Again I will take a step even further out on the limb. Time after time we have people come to the site for guidance as to "What should I purchase?" "Is there really such a big difference between the 03-04s and the 05-06s"?

If you are looking for a fun driving experience in a unique vehicle, that will make you grin from ear to ear, it makes no difference. If you are looking for the best performance, along with owning a vehicle that had been "updated and fixed" by GM as they continued to build SSRs through their life cycle, then buy the best 05-06 you can afford. That is the advice that was given to me by several members of this board while I was looking.

I would suggest that before someone buys an 03-04 and then immediately starts thinking about bolting on a $$$ supercharger may have bought the wrong SSR. JMHO. Let the flaming begin...

P.S. I am certain I will have inadvertently insulted someone on the board and please let it be known, that was not my intent.
From my observation of 03-04 vs. 05-06, I notice more of the 05-06 are adding the performance enhancing bolt-on goodies. My studies was base on the follow threads.
The SUPERCHARGED Club
and
4.56 Club
and
4.56 Gear Club, Who's in?
and finally
4.10 Gear Club, Who's In???
__________________
SSR Parts Exchange It works for us all
RUN ROD RUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:20 PM   #28 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
MnMsToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 6,744


View MnMsToy's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by js73751 View Post
I'm going to step way out on a limb here. If you are looking for an SSR with a higher level of performance, why didn't you buy an 05 or 06? If that was the limit of your budget I understand. I would just like to note that by the time you add all of the performance enhancing bolt-ons to get it to perform as you wish, if you took the money necessary to do so, and added it to what you paid for your 04, ($24,000 if I am correct) you could probably have purchased an 05-06.

Again I will take a step even further out on the limb. Time after time we have people come to the site for guidance as to "What should I purchase?" "Is there really such a big difference between the 03-04s and the 05-06s"? Yes and No!

If you are looking for a fun driving experience in a unique vehicle, that will make you grin from ear to ear, it makes no difference. If you are looking for the best performance, along with owning a vehicle that had been "updated and fixed" by GM as they continued to build SSRs through their life cycle, then buy the best 05-06 you can afford. That is the advice that was given to me by several members of this board while I was looking. I waited until I had saved more so I could get what I was told would be the best years to purchase. I appreciated their advice and have never regretted taking it.

I would suggest that if someone buys an 03-04, and then immediately starts thinking about bolting on a $$$ supercharger, or a NOS system, may have bought the wrong SSR. JMHO. Let the flaming begin...

P.S. I am certain I will have inadvertently insulted someone on the board and please let it be known, that was not my intent.
Thank you for NOT being politically correct. It is refreshing. But maybe a new thread would have been a better starting point, just saying........
MnMsToy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:22 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
js73751's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 363


My SSR:
2006 FPR Silver 3SS with Chrome Package
View js73751's Photo Gallery
Jeff, I did not suggest that the 05-06 owners are not looking for better performance (myself included). One of the great joys of SSR ownership is making it our own (like your fantastic paint job)

I just noticed that the original poster has already added a Superchip, exhaust change, headers, and has asked about heads, cams, NOS, and a supercharger. His goal is to bring it up to 400 HP. Factor in the cost to get it there and I think it will end up costing more than an 05 which already has a 400hp baseline on which to build.

Last edited by js73751; 10-24-2010 at 08:41 PM.
js73751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 08:23 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
js73751's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 363


My SSR:
2006 FPR Silver 3SS with Chrome Package
View js73751's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by MnMsToy View Post
Thank you for NOT being politically correct. It is refreshing. But maybe a new thread would have been a better starting point, just saying........
I thought about it but felt that this particular post illustrated my point regarding bringing an 03 up to an 05's specs. To be continued...

Last edited by js73751; 07-22-2011 at 09:24 AM.
js73751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Chevy SSR Forum > SSR Discussion > SSR Performance


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2