Chevy SSR Forum Chevy SSR Forum
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors


Go Back   Chevy SSR Forum > SSR Discussion > SSR Technical Discussion
Register Home Forums Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
SSRFanatic.com is the premier SSR Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2006, 02:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Obsessive mad scientist
Supporting Member

JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,758


View JimGnitecki's Photo Gallery
03/04 and 05/06 accelerator pedal assemblies are NOT the same!

Diagnostics I did over this weekend to address a technical problem uncovered something that might be useful for other Fanatics to know: the accelerator pedal assembly on the 03/04 SSRs is NOT the same as the one on the 05/06 SSRs! And, there are consequences.

Some of you know that at the urging of 2005SSR6speed, I recently installed a 90mm throttle body off his 05 SSR onto my highly modified 04 SSR (which comes stock with a 75 mm thottle body that is also much dirtier aerdynamically). It has been working GREAT at most throttle openings short of WOT, but when I put my foot to the floor, the computer delcares an "engine protection emergency" and forces the engine to idle. This is inconvenient.

Me, 2005SSR6speed, Lyndon Wester (tuner), JohnSpear (Speartech Inc), and others have been trying to figure out what is going on, as the combination of parts I am using works well on numerous Chevy pickups with LM4 engines and electronics. Something in the SSR is different (here we go again). This weekend, I did some diagnostics trying to determine if the acclerator pedal had anything to do with it. Turns out, I did not find anything that solves the problem, bu DID find that the 03/04 and 05/06 pedal assemblies are electronically different. Let me explain that, and how it can affect other Fanatics in either a helpful or adverse way.

First, some background. I had started out of course with a sotck 04 pedal assembly. But, I wanted the accessory ALLOY pedal faces, so I went to GMPartsDirect.com and looked for them. They did not show the alloy pedal face kit for my 04 SSR, but did show a kit for an 05 SSR. I figured that since the pedals are physically identical in appearance and size, the 05 pedal faces would work on my 04 pedals. I ordered the kit. When it arrived, I confirmed that the pedal faces in the kit looked identical to my 04 faces (other than the alloy versus rubber of course). However, I noted that the kit includes an alloy FACE for the brake kit, an alloy dead pedal face, but a complete acclerator pedal assembly. I assumed that this was because the accelerator pedal is PINNED into the accelerator pedal asssembly, and GM doesn't want buyers hacking up a safety-related assembly to switch from rubber to alloy pedal face. I figured no problem, I'll just make the swap and everything will be fine.

I made the swap, and it DID indeed seem fine.

I did notice around that same timethat the throttle response seemed better, but I did not put 2 and 2 together at the time.

Fast forward a couple of weeks to when Randy and I installed the 90mm throttle body. Withut repeating all the details here that are already in my posting on the 90mm throttle body (search using "90 mm throttle body"), we ran into a snag that focused my attention: the inability to apply WOT. We have been working on that for a couple of weeks.

In the meantime, I have been educating myself on a topic I never thought I would want any expertise on: the electronics of electronic throttle control assemblies. Tis is where I got a glimmer that those two acclerator pedal assembliesmight NOT in fact be electronically the same.

My problem was that I could see no good reason for there being more than one "standard" pedal assembly. After all, with the electronic throttle control (ETC) on the SSR, the "response" caused by any movement of the pedal can be programmatically "tuned" in the onboard computer's software to be virtually any response curve you want (subject to some common sense restrictions, like 10% throttle pedal movement will not be accepted as commanding WOT, for safety reasons). So, since customization costs money in design, parts stocking, and programming, I couldn't imagine why Delphi would "wire" the pedal on an 03/04 SSR differently than they would wire an 05/06 SSR pedal, or for that matter, a Corvette pedal. But, I was wrong. I discovered that this weekend.

I took the bellows off my throttle body, placed a flashlight and mirror in front of it so I could see the throttle blade movement clearly from the driver's seat, turned the ignition key (but not engine!) "on", and started playing with the pedal.

Very educational.

It turns out that fairly small initial movement of the 05 pedal causes a pretty substantial reaction at the throttle blade. I kept pushing the pedal further and further, noting the resulting position of the throttle blade. I finally hit a point where the throttle blade was 100% open. Interestingly, the pedal was NOT all the way to its stop. I continued pushing the pedal further in small increments. There was no corresponding blade movement (remember, it was already 100% open). But then, at a certain point of additional pedal movement, the throttle blade abruptly snapped shut!!

I interpreted that to mean that the PCM was now receiving a voltage that was somehow "out of range" for use with the new thottle body. (Remember, this pedal had worked fine with the stock throttle body).

I then went through the hassle of swapping back to the stock 04 pedal assembly, and repeated the testing. With the 04 pedal assembly installed, the throttle blade movement was SMALLER initially (less movement of throttle blade per millimeter of pedal travel), but the blade ended up at 100% open by about the same TOTAL (cumulative) pedal movement. After that, the blade reacted the same way as it had to the 05 pedal when I applied yet more pedal movement: no apaprent response at first, and then at a certain point, the blade snapped shut.

Ok, what have we learned? Well, here is what I see:

- The 05 SSR pedal is more "front end loaded". In other words, when you start applying pedal movement, it generates more blade movement per millimeter of pedal movement than the 04 pedal does.

- However, both pedals hit "100%" blade opening after about the same cumulative amount of pedal movement

- Both pedals cause the "engine protection mode" (blade snaps shut) after a certain amount of "excess" pedal movement

- Both pedals worked just fine with the 75mm throttle body, so the difference is in whatever else has changed, which includes:

- the new 90 mm throttle body

- the new wiring harness adaptor that enables you to plug the new 90mm throttle body into an 03/04 vehicle wiring harness

- The new TAC module (Throttle Acutation Control module) that is required to be instaleld on an 03/04 SSR when using the 05/06 throttle body, because the electornics on the 03/04 are different than those on the 05/06

There is an obvious predictable result for anyone who puts the GM 05/06 pedal face kit onto an 03/04: since the kit includes the 05 pedal assembly, the vehicle will feel friskier at lower throttle settings. Now, you could get that same friskiness, or MORE friskiness, just by having a tuner tune the software in the computer, but this is a pretty easy alternate way to change the throttle feel.

But there is a more important outcome to note: the 03/04 throttle pedal assemblie are not ELECTRONICALLY the same as the 05/06 throttle pedal assemblies, even though they are PHYSICALLY similar in appearance.

The same caution may apply to other assemblies that we might have assumed tobe identical . . .

Jim G
JimGnitecki is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-11-2006, 05:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member

Dick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 60


My SSR:
2006 Redline Red Auto - "Last Prod. Run"
View Dick's Photo Gallery
Great Report !!!

Your report on this matter is excellent and a great example of the value of this forum.

Let's all keep on sharing these kinds of experiences. As time goes on I predict that we will get even less technical support from dealers.

By the way, is there a way to access the TSB's from GM on the SSR's? We had a place to go in our sister groups for the Corvettes. How about the SSR's?

Dick
Dick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 06:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member

drbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central NY
Posts: 149


My SSR:
2003 Redline Red #2173 SuperMaxx Headers Flowmaster Exhaust Predator tuned ADDCO Bars
View drbob's Photo Gallery
A question for Jim G

I put the pedals on my 03 and haven't experienced a cutout at WOT, though mine isn't highly modded.

The question is what does this really mean for the everyday Joe who has a relatively stock SSR. Is it going to cause problems? Should we take the pin out of our 03 and just replace the pedal? Inquiring minds want to know.

Thanks for any feedback


drbob
drbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 07:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Obsessive mad scientist
Supporting Member

JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,758


View JimGnitecki's Photo Gallery
drBob: Installing an 05 pedal into an 03 or 04 does not appear to create a problem, wherther the 03/04 is stock or modified. It is the change to the 90mm throttle body that created the WOT problem for me. Remember, I was running the 05 pedal in my highly modified (including supercharging) 04 without any problem whasoever until I chnaged that throttle body.

By installing the 05 pedal into an 03/04, you will likely just notice a bit more satisfying throttle response at LOW accelerator pedal movement ranges. Then, as you increase the amount of pedal movement, the 05 pedal delivers LESS additional throttle blade opening than the 04 one does. Most people would like the 05 pedal response when installed in an 03/04. One exception: if you drive on ice or snow, the slower reaction rate of the 03/04 pedal gives you better control.

Jim G
JimGnitecki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 08:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member

drbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central NY
Posts: 149


My SSR:
2003 Redline Red #2173 SuperMaxx Headers Flowmaster Exhaust Predator tuned ADDCO Bars
View drbob's Photo Gallery
Thanks Jim G

Again, thanks a lot for all the info you provide to us here.

drbob
drbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 08:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
Supporting Vendor Supporting Member

2005SSR6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 3,362


My SSR:
VIN# 19184 - 13 Dec 04
View 2005SSR6Speed's Photo Gallery
This is just part of the research that needs to be done on any modification before we can advise this to the other members. I am glad we have gotten to this point, and I thank Jim for the experimenting he continues to do to find solutions. I just wish Jim lived around the corner, it would make these times alot easier. I am also glad that I have unlimited minutes on my Cell Phone!
__________________
http://www.leftcoast32.com
'07 Black TrailBlazer SS "MP122HH" MagnaCharger
'05 SSR 6 Speed 427 "MP122HH" MagnaCharger
Authorized MagnaCharger Dealer/Distributor
2005SSR6Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 09:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Obsessive mad scientist
Supporting Member

JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,758


View JimGnitecki's Photo Gallery
This experimentation is not cheap, either.

Even though Joe generously gave me the 90mm throttle, I had to buy the TAC, the wiring harness adaptor, the supercharger intake cone, and pay Randy to disassemble and reasemble and make everything fit.

With the time and money in this mod, it better work REALLY well.

Jim G
JimGnitecki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 10:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member

FlashBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: central cali coast
Posts: 1,015


My SSR:
05 6spd,magnacharger,4:10s,2.9 pulley,corvettte TB, hotchkiss,short shifter,conti UHP's, Mikes fans,
View FlashBack's Photo Gallery
Interesting. I have an 05 6 speed that has had an intermittant problem whereas I experience periods of significantly reduced throttle response. So much so that I actually tip forward in my seat when upshifting due to the unexpected change. The truck feels like a slug given the habitual pedal travel. Agressive use of the throttle shows that the power is really there, but down much further on the pedal. Pulling the computer fuses, and replacing restores normal throttle. I have been suspicious that the problem might be caused by my replacment stainless gas pedal assembly also, thinking that the sender was either defective or not to spec. I will test it soon electronically on a bench next to my stock assembly to see if there is any difference.
I will let you know the results.
FlashBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 11:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
HeaD FulL of STufF
Supporting Member

hdflstf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 7,502


My SSR:
'05 Silver Six Speed #18871
View hdflstf's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.0scSSR
Interesting. I have an 05 6 speed that has had an intermittant problem whereas I experience periods of significantly reduced throttle response. So much so that I actually tip forward in my seat when upshifting due to the unexpected change. The truck feels like a slug given the habitual pedal travel. Agressive use of the throttle shows that the power is really there, but down much further on the pedal. Pulling the computer fuses, and replacing restores normal throttle. I have been suspicious that the problem might be caused by my replacment stainless gas pedal assembly also, thinking that the sender was either defective or not to spec. I will test it soon electronically on a bench next to my stock assembly to see if there is any difference.
I will let you know the results.
It may also be a result of the torque management - yes even the 6 speed. Mine was at best random in how it would respond to throttle commands. Goes like gangbusters one time, next time I hit the gas it just lacks power. No real rhyme or reason. With the torque management removed (at least to some degree) the throttle response is much more consistent.
hdflstf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 07:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member

FlashBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: central cali coast
Posts: 1,015


My SSR:
05 6spd,magnacharger,4:10s,2.9 pulley,corvettte TB, hotchkiss,short shifter,conti UHP's, Mikes fans,
View FlashBack's Photo Gallery
Could well be the problem. Just don't know why it would be intermittent. The reduced throttle kicks in even when I am driving easy I will be getting the trq mgt erased next week and will see. Thanks
FlashBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 12:50 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member

PSI Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 129


My SSR:
2006 Slingshot Yellow 6-Speed 3SS
View PSI Racing's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdflstf
It may also be a result of the torque management - yes even the 6 speed. Mine was at best random in how it would respond to throttle commands. Goes like gangbusters one time, next time I hit the gas it just lacks power. No real rhyme or reason. With the torque management removed (at least to some degree) the throttle response is much more consistent.

I have experienced the same issues with our stock truck. I will post an update when the torque management is removed.

There seem to be alot of "issues" with the tune on the 6-speeds, not as smooth, decel delay/throttle follower is annoying, intermittent surging at part throttle.
I'm hoping that tuning will also help these drivability issues.
PSI Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 01:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
HeaD FulL of STufF
Supporting Member

hdflstf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 7,502


My SSR:
'05 Silver Six Speed #18871
View hdflstf's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSI Racing
I have experienced the same issues with our stock truck. I will post an update when the torque management is removed.

There seem to be alot of "issues" with the tune on the 6-speeds, not as smooth, decel delay/throttle follower is annoying, intermittent surging at part throttle.
I'm hoping that tuning will also help these drivability issues.
Getting rid of the torque management (or at least part of it) will help. Hard to say what the tune will do unless you know what they are doing to it.. I expect it'll be more driveable. I'm still trying to get a Westers tune set up on mine. Got it running with the new computer but can't do the crank re-learn yet. I'll be posting a new thread on that once all is said and done.
hdflstf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Chevy SSR Forum > SSR Discussion > SSR Technical Discussion





Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.