Chevy SSR Forum Chevy SSR Forum
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   Chevy SSR Forum > Off Topic > General Off Topic

SsrFanatic.com is the premier Chevrolet SSR forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 05:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MelloYello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Benbrook, Texas
Posts: 220


My SSR:
Mellow Yellow '05 M6...18277 Born 11-04
View MelloYello's Photo Gallery
Exclamation Why The 2009 Camaro Is Doomed

Motorheads don’t want to hear it; refuse to believe it — but ugly realities are coming down hard on the ‘09 Camaro that will very possibly cause GM to pull the plug before the first one ever rolls off the line.

Doubt that? Consider the stillborn rear-wheel-drive next generation Chevy Impala — nixed because of concerns within GM about the possibility of meeting the pending (2012) 35 mpg fuel economy edict recently passed by Congress. A lighter front-drive car with a V-6 instead of a V-8 can make the cut; a V-8 RWD Impala can’t. So it’s gone. So is the talked-about next generation GTO. And the future of the G8 sedan looks not so good. GM is openly talking about scaling back the entire Pontiac division — and ending its role as a performance brand.

No bull; not my opinion. Just facts.

Now consider the 2009 Camaro — and the world in which it will have to swim. Gas prices are already surging toward $4 per gallon for regular unleaded. And Camaro’s not even here yet. By the time the car reaches production status in about eight months or so, we may very well be at $5 per gallon.

Maybe more.

At the same time, the buying power of the dollar is falling down the well — so everything is becoming more expensive, not just gas. And most of us are not making more money to compensate. Quite the opposite. Inflation and income stagnation are hitting us hard. Those of us who still have jobs and have been able to maintain the same income we had a year or so ago are few, thankful — and nervous. Buying a new car is not on our agenda. And buying a frivolous new car even less so. Camaro is not an exotic; it is a "Joe Sixpack" kind of car — so middle class and working class buyer skittishness is no small thing.

GM is well aware of these facts — which are going to kneecap Camaro (and any car like it) on the consumer level. Whatever the projected sales potential was two years ago should probably be cut in half. Bet your bippie that the bean counters within GM have thought about this, too.

That’s bad enough — and by itself could be sufficient to make going ahead with Camaro in 2009 about as sensible as building something like a Series 62 Cadillac would have been in 1979.

But wait, there’s more. Don’t forget the 10,000 pound Tallboy bomb that’s about to fall onto GM’s head (and ours) in the form of the 35 mpg CAFE edict. That changes … everything. The recession, crippling gas prices and declining buying power of the dollar are merely the coupe de grace.

A V-6 Camaro could maybe meet the current 27.5 mpg CAFE requirement for passenger cars without major engineering changes/expenses or hitting buyers with a "gas guzzler" surcharge that would bump the purchase price of the car up by $1,000 or more.

But 35 mpg? Only a few four-cylinder economy compacts and hybrids make it under that bar. Anything much over about 3,200 pounds with an engine larger than 3 liters is getting iffy. With a 300-plus hp V-8 engine and rear-wheel-drive?

Forget it.

Don’t believe it? Chew on this:

The current Ford Mustang GT — a car very similar in layout/power and so on to the pending ‘09 Camaro — manages just 17 mpg in city driving and 26 mpg on the highway. That’s with the 4 liter V-6 engine, by the way. The GT’s 4.6 liter V-8 (300 hp) slurps it down at the rate of 15 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway. To survive 35 mpg CAFE, the V-8 Mustang GT would have to somehow nearly double its current average fuel economy. How is this going to be achieved, exactly? Think Ford is worried about the Mustang’s viability?

You’d better believe it.

The new Dodge Challenger is in even worse shape, CAFE wise. Its wonderful 6.1 liter V-8 won’t last long in this world, given city mileage of 13 mpg — and highway mileage that isn’t even out of the teens (18 mpg). Yes, a V-6 version is coming, but the most efficient engines of this size/type that Chrysler has available - like Ford — don’t come close to delivering 35 mpg.

Camaro’s in the same pickle. Neither the base V-6 version nor the high-powered V-8 model have a prayer of achieving CAFE compliance. If they’re produced, buyers will be facing huge "gas guzzler" surcharges that will only add to the growing roster of negatives arguing against making a purchase — from $75 fill-ups to the general uselessness of cars of these type, beyond their ability to provide a good time.

And here’s the deal: Chrysler’s already on the hook; the commitment to production has been made. It will have to at least try to make a go of it. For awhile. Ford has a strong buyer base for the Mustang; a case can be made that even with gas guzzler fees and generally awful times, economically speaking, it’s worth trying to hold the line — at least, for the moment.

But Camaro?

GM no longer has a sure bet buyer base; the name has been out of circulation for almost seven years now. That is a long time, regardless of other external issues, such as gas prices. Rebuilding a brand/make of car is tough in the best of times. In bad times, it is a fool’s errand. And it’s a luxury that cash-strapped, no longer number one GM cannot afford to indulge. If Camaro sinks — as all signs indicate it will — GM will lose a ton of money. Remember that unlike Challenger (which is "spun off" the existing Charger sedan) GM has had to invest a great deal in what amounts to a brand-new platform/tooling and so on to make this happen. Big sales are needed to make it up. It increasingly looks as though that is extremely unlikely to happen.

Which is why GM may just abort the whole thing before it ever sees the light of day.

You wait and see.
MelloYello is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-16-2008, 05:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Thank You To Our Troops
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Gina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maggie Valley, NC (Smoky Mtns.)/On The Road For The Winter
Posts: 15,556


My SSR:
2006 Aqua Blur FPR Chrome Inside & Out , 2004 Redline Red,TAZMOBILE (deceased)
View Gina's Photo Gallery
I'm just glad it didnt happen to the SSR.
__________________

Enjoy the Rest of Your Summer
Gina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
1998Thundercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hudson Bay, SK Canada
Posts: 57


My SSR:
2006 Black over Silver #14 of 45 Allstate 400
View 1998Thundercat's Photo Gallery
Exclamation Ahh Bah Hum Bug!

I don't know where you got your info from, but the USA is not GMs only market. Up here in Canada the economy is still somewhat booming, maybe not in my little world with me facing a lay off, but it seems everywhere around me they are crying for people to come work & are willing to pay more than I'm making now! Along with that the way that the Mustang, Challenger, & Camaro are designed are for the Baby Boomers which are looking at retiring & already have made their nest eggs. They will be wishing for their old hot rods & when they see these come out they will buy them just to go cruising in like in the old days. Plus the young guys & gals that are now moving in to the job market are going to spend their money on a sports car even if it isn't practical. They will want that hot rod, plus the smart ones will have not only the muscle car but will also have a truck or other vehicle to go do the daily driving. These weren't designed with those of us in between them, we have families or are just starting families are the ones that will be looking at the other vehicles you talked about & we will be on the side lines drooling over the them & wishing. However we will have to wait until we can either make a fortune to be able to have both or wait until the kids are on their own & we become the retired people.

Well that is my $0.02 anyways!
1998Thundercat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Paradise sucks!
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Maui Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,304


My SSR:
Formerly an O-Six with 3 Pedals
View Maui Mike's Photo Gallery
So why the return of the 2009 Corvette ZR-1? How is it and the Caddy passing the new reg's??? Bring them out, then dump them by 2012?

Bob Lutz reports the return of the ZR-1 in mid 2008 as a 2009 model. Powered by the Supercharged LS9 w/ at least 620 HP and 590 lb-ft of torque. The 620 means 115 HP more than a Z06. The 2009 Caddy CTS-V gets the Supercharged 550+HP LSA w/ 9 lbs of Boost.

If it's true, then it's a sad sad day in MotorHead World. And that's a BIG IF!
__________________
Maui Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
YESSSR
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Jgrden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 25,669


My SSR:
YESSSR
View Jgrden's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1998Thundercat View Post
I don't know where you got your info from, but the USA is not GMs only market. Up here in Canada the economy is still somewhat booming, maybe not in my little world with me facing a lay off, but it seems everywhere around me they are crying for people to come work & are willing to pay more than I'm making now! Along with that the way that the Mustang, Challenger, & Camaro are designed are for the Baby Boomers which are looking at retiring & already have made their nest eggs. They will be wishing for their old hot rods & when they see these come out they will buy them just to go cruising in like in the old days. Plus the young guys & gals that are now moving in to the job market are going to spend their money on a sports car even if it isn't practical. They will want that hot rod, plus the smart ones will have not only the muscle car but will also have a truck or other vehicle to go do the daily driving. These weren't designed with those of us in between them, we have families or are just starting families are the ones that will be looking at the other vehicles you talked about & we will be on the side lines drooling over the them & wishing. However we will have to wait until we can either make a fortune to be able to have both or wait until the kids are on their own & we become the retired people.

Well that is my $0.02 anyways!
That is the spirit.
Jgrden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Resident Rocket Scientist
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
hdflstf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PNW aka Mukilteo USA
Posts: 9,360


My SSR:
'05 Silver Six Speed #18871
View hdflstf's Photo Gallery
The catch is that it's a fleetwide requirement not an individual car requirement. So they need to sell so many fuel sippers for each guzzler they sell.
__________________
Ads Suck
hdflstf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
TommyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Bernardino,CA
Posts: 541


My SSR:
2005 Slingshot #17759 6-speed
View TommyB's Photo Gallery
Better call a mushroom farmer,sounds like a load of poop to me.

Just the opinion of one automotive columnist Eric Peters.His opinion on the Camaro is all over the internet.

Why The 2009 Camaro Is Doomed
Make sure to read all the replies on that blog.

I look at it this way....I'm a very simple man....look at things in a simple/common sence kinda way.If you cant afford Grey Pupon dont buy a Bentley....if you cant afford 5 dollars a gallon for gas dont buy anything with a V8 (or larger) engine.
TommyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 06:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Paradise sucks!
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Maui Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,304


My SSR:
Formerly an O-Six with 3 Pedals
View Maui Mike's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyB View Post
Make sure to read all the replies on that blog.

I did!
__________________
Maui Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 07:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
TLC5 in CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT.
Posts: 309


My SSR:
VIN No. 24061
View TLC5 in CT's Photo Gallery
I believe I just read somewhere that the new ZR1 actually produced 638 HP on a dyno. Did anyone else see that?
TLC5 in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 08:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
YESSSR
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Jgrden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 25,669


My SSR:
YESSSR
View Jgrden's Photo Gallery
Houtex:
What is your opinion on the rumored demise of the Camero??
Jgrden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 08:16 PM   #11 (permalink)
Paradise sucks!
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Maui Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,304


My SSR:
Formerly an O-Six with 3 Pedals
View Maui Mike's Photo Gallery
Chevrolet Camaro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Maui Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 08:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
TommyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Bernardino,CA
Posts: 541


My SSR:
2005 Slingshot #17759 6-speed
View TommyB's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLC5 in CT View Post
I believe I just read somewhere that the new ZR1 actually produced 638 HP on a dyno. Did anyone else see that?
I saw that too.On this link.

Officially Official: Corvette ZR1 makes 638 hp and 604 lb-ft - Autoblog
TommyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 09:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
Carolina Cruisers
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 1,403


My SSR:
04 Slingshot Born on 6/23/04
View leeb's Photo Gallery
Here's what Chevy sent me today:

Chevrolet Camaro | The Inside Stories of the 2010 Chevy Camaro
leeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 09:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ssr3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: arlington, tx
Posts: 689


My SSR:
Smokin' Asphalt 2006
View ssr3's Photo Gallery
I got the same email from GM yesterday. Says 1st quarter of 2009!
ssr3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
WearyEagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 4,140


My SSR:
'06 Screamin' Redline Red Vin # 23025 3SS Born Dec, 4, 2005 , Chrome package, gauges
View WearyEagle's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyB View Post
Better call a mushroom farmer,sounds like a load of poop to me.

Just the opinion of one automotive columnist Eric Peters.His opinion on the Camaro is all over the internet.

Why The 2009 Camaro Is Doomed
Make sure to read all the replies on that blog.

I look at it this way....I'm a very simple man....look at things in a simple/common sence kinda way.If you cant afford Grey Pupon dont buy a Bentley....if you cant afford 5 dollars a gallon for gas dont buy anything with a V8 (or larger) engine.
I agree with much of what you say, Tommy, but the REALITY is NOT ENOUGH people will. The bean counters have to sell a lot of these rocketships to make it a viable project. GM doesn't have room for any more demographic errors. I quite agree with the Original Post (with no credit given the writer ) as it lays out some pretty sobering facts for all muscle car manufacturers in a $5 gas environment (who thinks it will stop rising at $5 ? )
WearyEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 12:30 AM   #16 (permalink)
Daily Driver
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
xoxoxoBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DelCo, PA
Posts: 983


My SSR:
'06- Silver/Copper- 121421
View xoxoxoBruce's Photo Gallery
If they do build it, and that's a big if, considering GM's financial condition, it will be a HALO vehicle. Showroom traffic and street creds are worth a lot.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 11:19 AM   #17 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
REBEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,793


View REBEL's Photo Gallery
...

When they build it, Im not buying it.

G.M. Trained me with the SSR to never buy the first year of a new model.

The SSR was cheaper and better every proceeding year.
REBEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 11:56 AM   #18 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
TommyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Bernardino,CA
Posts: 541


My SSR:
2005 Slingshot #17759 6-speed
View TommyB's Photo Gallery
Well,if the Camaro is in the same price range of the Mustang (V6 vs V6 & V8 vs V8) I dont see why GM would have a problem selling the car.The MPG on the new Mustang GT's $uck (and I know first hand,the ex-wife still has the 2007 GT) and I personally think GM will get better MPG numbers with the Camaro.I spend all week on the road and see thousands of Mustangs, so if the Camaro is in the same price range and gets a equal or better average MPG I need a better reason why it wont sell.

Guys on the Camaro forums have waiting for years to buy the new car, most standing with money in hand.
TommyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 07:36 AM   #19 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Supporting Member
 
pikeville904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pikeville, TN
Posts: 3,162


My SSR:
Aqua Blur '05,#18006, Diablo Preditor, K&N, Spoiler,
View pikeville904's Photo Gallery
You spoke of the new Challenger, according to what I've heard and read, the car is sold out on the first years production, and they are selling into the second year now... although they have not been produced.

I tend to agree... those that want them will buy, weather they get 35 mpg or 15 mpg. The ones tht do, will be the folks that already have their living made, or are making enough to support thier new Camaro.
__________________
Be who you are and say what you feel....Because those that matter....don't mind....And those that mind....don't matter. "
pikeville904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 09:17 AM   #20 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
REBEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,793


View REBEL's Photo Gallery
...

They will sell , just not to me the first year or two.
We are in the time of having two or more cars.
One for transportation needs,one or more for play.
The Camaro will be a play toy for many, like the SSR is for me.

Last edited by REBEL; 05-18-2008 at 09:23 AM.
REBEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 10:01 AM   #21 (permalink)
one bad dox
Supporting Member
 
ibjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Payson/Mesa,AZ
Posts: 28,170


My SSR:
BRUISSR #2 of 9 blue/black
View ibjeff's Photo Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by pikeville904 View Post
You spoke of the new Challenger, according to what I've heard and read, the car is sold out on the first years production, and they are selling into the second year now... although they have not been produced.
Customer ship dates for the Dodge Chllenger around here are the end of May.(this month) all presold.
__________________
SSR DOX The truth of who we are is innate goodness and the whole journey is about removing the obstacle or false belief that keeps us from knowing that.
ibjeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:07 PM   #22 (permalink)
SSR Pit Crew
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
HALSSSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Port Orchard,Washington
Posts: 1,311


My SSR:
2005 SSR Modified W/Love
View HALSSSR's Photo Gallery
The glass is half empty bullcrap mentallity!!

I think it's damm time we ,the true American spirit that is still alive and IMO, is grossly underestimated by the no talent empty suits, college people that are coming out of our liberal socialist universities today,it is criminal to see the brain washing that is being introduced to these fresh minds,poison! Fact,we have the technology to get 25/50 percent better gas mileage on these cars and trucks,but it is being surpressed,IMO< by our very own government and
big oil companies.I believe we are being screwed by both of these enities inorder to put the usa in line with the global market price for oil.The only problem with their reasoning is we aren't Europe! Their industry and hwyway infrastructure is all geared to narrow roads and small vehicles. We are America
and have the luxury of wide open spaces,room for wide freeways and highways,I don't want to be like a socialist,having all one freedoms taken away by government supression,taxation,inferior health care etc. we have hydrogen technology right now that can make these current vehicles capable
of 50mpg plus,if you want to know the truth,I believe it will break out simply due to the need for technology in this area to make it self present,just like electricity did when it was discovered and made available to the masses etc.
Perhaps it's time to venture even further into what we call the future,with a technology so advanced it would evoke the need for air cars,like you see in sci-fi movies,nevertheless,hopeless mentality is not the American way,yes the facts are lousy,but that's only because there is no one telling the damm truth about anything anymore,it's all for one and screw the other guy philosophy it seems to me! Look at what's happening in our backyard here in Washington State,with the North American Eagle land speed racer jet car,these bunch of guys,with total mixed backgrounds are putting their heads together are taking current technology with a brain storm
attitude of "necessity is the mother of invention" and that my fanatic friends is what I speak of,Good old American ingenuity! Hell yes,not this pathetic oh well we are doomed bulls***! Come America,think WE can,not can't!!
__________________
HALSSSR
HALSSSR is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

  Chevy SSR Forum > Off Topic > General Off Topic


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2